Closed fujch7 closed 3 years ago
Well you can specify your first-step phylogeny as a starting tree via --tree
option. In some cases, it can decrease tree inference time, but also increase the risk of hitting a local optimum. In general, there is no guarantee that a "better" starting tree leads to a better-scoring final ML tree. We therefore recommend using multiple distinct starting, which is now the default in RAxML-NG.
closing since the question was answered
Hi developers,
Is this a two-step tree building method like raxml? by deriving the first phylogeny with any of the available approaches and then refine it in a second step using RAxML.
Many thanks!