Closed ceren-yildirim closed 1 month ago
Hi Ceren,
IIRC --ancestral
does not really modify the tree topology, so what you observe must be either a rooting/visualization artifact, or the result of the intermediate step you used to obtain ${1}.bestTree_unrooted
from ${1}.bestTree
.
So please double check, and if you still think that the unexpected change in topology is coming from the --ancestral
command, please upload all relevant input and output files, and I will try to reproduce.
Hi again,
Thank you very much for your time and assistance.
I realized that the intermediate step was problematic, even though it initially seemed fine. Your help made me aware of this issue.
Thanks again for your support.
Perfect, you're welcome!
For visualization issues connected to rooted trees, please also have a look at:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28369572/
Alexis
On 23.05.24 16:04, Oleksiy Kozlov wrote:
Hi Ceren,
IIRC |--ancestral| does not really modify the tree topology, so what you observe must be either a rooting/visualization artifact, or the result of the intermediate step you used to obtain |${1}.bestTree_unrooted| from |${1}.bestTree|.
So please double check, and if you still think that the unexpected change in topology is coming from the |--ancestral| command, please upload all relevant input and output files, and I will try to reproduce.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng/issues/184#issuecomment-2127056677, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGXB6VYUDNMXYAFZ5ZSVLLZDXSPDAVCNFSM6AAAAABIDXDSRCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMRXGA2TMNRXG4. You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: @.***>
-- Alexandros (Alexis) Stamatakis
ERA Chair, Institute of Computer Science, Foundation for Research and Technology - Hellas Research Group Leader, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies Full Professor, Dept. of Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
www.biocomp.gr (Crete lab) www.exelixis-lab.org (Heidelberg lab)
Thank you!
Hello,
I am using RAxML-NG to generate ancestral trees for my exon sequences derived from eukaryotic genomes. My workflow is as follows:
I have approximately 100-200 sequences in my MSA, each around 200 nucleotides in length. However, I have encountered an issue:
Some sequences are duplicated in my dataset. In the .raxml.bestTree, these duplicates are correctly clustered together. However, in the raxml.ancestralTree, these duplicates appear on different branches.
From the best tree:![image](https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng/assets/100361704/35093a64-754d-42b8-89a1-206e3753e449)
From the ancestral tree:![image](https://github.com/amkozlov/raxml-ng/assets/100361704/05b95f65-c048-4290-9c09-b98d8392061b)
I am unsure why this discrepancy occurs. Is this expected behavior, or could there be an issue with my model or the tree-building process? I would appreciate any insights or suggestions on how to address this problem.
Additionally, I would like to improve the accuracy of my trees, especially given the relatively short length and small number of sequences. I increased the start trees and set --lh-epsilon 0.01. Could you suggest any additional parameters or strategies to further enhance the accuracy of my phylogenetic trees?
Thank you so much!