search

amplab / SparkNet

Distributed Neural Networks for Spark
MIT License
603 stars 172 forks source link

sbt assembly error #122

Closed abongLee closed 8 years ago

abongLee commented 8 years ago

[error] Could not run test TensorFlowNetSpec: java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: SPARKNET_HOME ... ... ... [error] Could not run test CaffeNetSpec: java.util.NoSuchElementException: key not found: SPARKNET_HOME [info] Run completed in 9 seconds, 564 milliseconds. [info] Total number of tests run: 6 [info] Suites: completed 4, aborted 0 [info] Tests: succeeded 6, failed 0, canceled 0, ignored 1, pending 0 [info] All tests passed. [error] Error during tests: [error] TensorFlowNetSpec [error] CaffeNetSpec 16/04/22 10:37:22 INFO RemoteActorRefProvider$RemotingTerminator: Remoting shut down. error sbt.TestsFailedException: Tests unsuccessful [error] Total time: 133 s, completed 2016-4-22 10:37:22

I got the errors shown above when running sbt assembly . and I have set the variable SPARKNET_HOME in the ~/.bashrc . I don't know why this happened .

Any help would be greatly appreciated . Thanks

robertnishihara commented 8 years ago

If you already set SPARKNET_HOME in the ~/.bashrc, can you try running source ~/.bashrc before compiling?

Or try running export SPARKNET_HOME=/path/to/SparkNet with the appropriate path?

abongLee commented 8 years ago

Yes , I do run source ~/.bashrc and I verify that by echo $SPARKNET_HOME It works well.

robertnishihara commented 8 years ago

Strange. One simple workaround would be to just hardcode the correct value for val sparkNetHome = ... in the relevant tests and apps.

abongLee commented 8 years ago

Thanks , It works . But another problem appears , [info] - should be fast * FAILED * [info] org.scalatest.exceptions.TestFailedException was thrown. (PreprocessorSpec.scala:146) I check the 146 line of PreprocessorSpec.scala is assert(totalTime <= 0.2) I try recomplie and things work out after comment assert(totalTime <= 0.2) I am not sure if there are some latent problems?

robertnishihara commented 8 years ago

Yeah, that line was meant to indicate that certain operations should be relatively fast, but the actual speed will depend on other factors and that line can fail even if there are no errors.

abongLee commented 8 years ago

Thanks, robert. It really helps