Open nigel436 opened 3 years ago
From running the page experience tool at the above link, it looks like the lab data (note: field data is not available) suggests that TBT can be improved:
Luckily, the recommendations at the bottom make some recommendations that are relevant to TBT. Have you tried preloading the runtime and taking a look at your server response time?
cc @ampproject/wg-performance
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.
https://amp.dev/page-experience/?url=https://companyjobsdirect.co.uk/job/waterstones-account-sales-6/
Your cached AMP page needs improvement(s). Your AMP page from origin has a good page experience, but the cached AMP page needs work. Don't fret, we have some recommendations to help you improve! However, it's rare that we see a cached AMP page fail page experience. Please file a GitHub issue so that we can take a look and see how AMP can help.