@ampproject/ac: the goal of this issue is to define what we want to achieve in 2020 for that focus area. Please comment below with you suggestions regarding that topic.
Goals:
Improve AMP’s accessibility
Make it easier to publish accessible AMP pages
Outcomes:
[x] Documentation for devs on how to make the components that they ship accessible.
[x] Audit of existing components. _(See open issues.)_
[ ] Accessibility reviews included in Intent to ship (I2S) and intent to prototype (I2P) processes.
Deliverables:
[ ] firm commitment to not ship new features unless they've been vetted/reviewed for A11y
[ ] identified linting/testing methods and ensure that the dev team integrates these into their workflow
[ ] include recommended browser/assistive tech (AT) combos and have them included on the AMP website
Ideas for Action:
[ ] Add accessibility as a design principles (e.g. “make the content is accessible by every user regardless of their ability”) [#114] (Maybe something for the Long-term Vision TF to consider.)
[ ] Add accessibility requirements to AMP validator [#115]. (This requires the components themselves to be accessible, and process and automation to make sure components stay accessible before thinking about such an idea.)
Making AMP really accessible.
@ampproject/ac: the goal of this issue is to define what we want to achieve in 2020 for that focus area. Please comment below with you suggestions regarding that topic.
See all Accessibility issues