Closed newmuis closed 4 years ago
Proposal from Paul is to make the 3 panel desktop UI default to 9:16. Biggest motivation is videos are increasingly including captions in them, needing more space for them to not be cut off.
We have some concerns about communications regarding this change. Making this change does not mean it’s not going to be cut-off in any other environment. Other platforms could still see content being cut off.
3 approaches show as many pixels of the video as possible show as many pixels of the video as possible. Show “safe area” in tooling
Charles: most clients’ videos are 16:9. Which is what most professionals shoot videos in. Problem in 9:16 is that it’s cropping a lot of the original 16:9 video. Someone has to crop the video to the point of interest. And then re-crop again to fit the 9:16 ratio.
What I like about the 3:5 (9:15) is that we can reduce the amount of cropping an original video and that it conserves more pixels of the original video.
I’m worried about the implicit recommendation by changing the default UI in the 3 panel desktop, a lot of users still prefer smaller screens.
Varun: Proposal is to make a clear distinction for creators of the “safe area” and “extra pixels” that could still be used at the tooling level.
Dima: give the option of snapping to 9:15 or 9:16 aspect ratio. Problem is where would they match. Because we don’t know that.
Charles: I see this as two separate problems (1) people relying too much on the 3 desktop UI, this can be addressed by using the amp-story-player for previewing the story at the tooling level (2) captions: we could use some other tools like automatic captioning, instead of baking the captions in the video. Should we focus the effort there instead?
Varun: We agree with you. I do think aspect ratio is important. Creators should know that what they see in the desktop UI will be different than what’s rendered in the phone. We’ll put together a proposal on how to address this.
Summary:
Concerns from deprecating the bookend. “It’s something nice to have. I am aware of the alternatives of CTA, page attachments, etc.. But it gives a space to advertise something outside of the story.”
Jon: Just to clarify we are not deprecating the concept of bookend, just the
As an AI we could create examples of a sidebar/bookend using the player + custom code to create an alternative.
Jon shows demo of sidebar with player
What about a param of bookend=”no”
A troubling scenario is that publishers won’t know what to expect in the output. Such as placing credits in the bookend. This could cause some problems.
Filing a FR on Github for first-class credits support (system layer button)
Q’s
Q’s about the player
Can you change the UI? You can change the UI outside of the iframes, but not inside of the story. You can style it however you would on a regular HTML element.
What are the performance implications of having the story in an iframe? For a regular website we optimized for this case, where we don’t load the player until it’s in the viewport. But it would always be faster to load the story directly.
It will only hit low android devices, but on most devices made in the past 5 years you are not going to have a problem. The resource allocation is the same, no other ux. GM: we used a prototype with both iframe and Shadow DOM. It just uses a bit more memory, which is fine in any recent device.
We also recycle the number of iframes we use, so that they don't grow as more stories are added to the player.
There are general best practices (most UI have this) around animation timing, sizing, etc.. Hong might have more specific insights on this. Hong: We will need some time to see what people create and introduce some more guidelines later.
Is amp-story-quiz released? The front-end is released. The backend external API is still being spec’d, coming in a Github API soon. We are hoping to release it with some other similar interactive features like polls, etc.. But it is released, so you can use it in your pages and test it out before it is valid AMP.
Should quizzes and polls be different components? We think they have different semantics / UX. Quizzes can ask a question and provide a correct answer at the end, while polls don't have a "correct" answer".
Concerns about quiz answers in the fronted could be problematic.
How will quizzes and polls be customizable? The UX is pretty consistent, but the UI you can change the colors. We’ll share some customization options
Meeting date/time (UTC)
2020-03-17 at 17:00 GMT
Instructions for joining the meeting
https://meet.google.com/ven-ztfk-esz
Agenda
Meeting Notes
TBD