Closed dnlsndr closed 1 week ago
I just had another look at the source code, and noticed that there's a "kind" property. Is that equivalent to the "type" property?
Ah yes, that is indeed the case :) closing
This should probably be better documented. That's because type is a reserved keyword iirc
yeah, maybe it would still be possible to add a "with_type" alias function, as that does not collide with any keywords, and then just map it to the same logic, the "with_kind" function has?
Fixed in amq-protocol 7.2.1
It's now automatically pulled by lapin 2.4
According to the AMQP 0.9.1 docs (https://www.rabbitmq.com/docs/publishers#message-properties), there's a message property called "type". I'm currently integrating against a 3rd party provider that requires this property for routing. It seems though, that I can not set up this property in the BasicProperties struct. Is it acceptable to implement this into the library? I can create a PR for that, if you wish.