Open uhermjakob opened 10 years ago
What about a rule that says: if LOCALE can be paraphrased as "the government of LOCALE", it should be AMRed accordingly?
Metonymic use of capital cities could be trickier...something like "government of the country whose capital is CITYNAME". (To contrast with the government of the city itself.) Likewise with headquarters (the White House, the Pentagon):
the White House
(b / building :name (n / name :op1 "White" :op2 "House")
:location-of (h / headquarter-01
:ARG1 (g / government-organization)))
the White House's argument
(t / thing
:ARG1-of (a / argue-01
:ARG0 (g / government-organization
:ARG1-of (h / headquarter-01
:location (b / building :name (n / name :op1 "White" :op2 "House"))))))
Or is that too complicated to read, even with a preprocessor?
I'm sure the IE annotation community has tackled metonymic usage before. We might either adopt their guidelines, or take what they do and then improve it. If anyone has their guidelines, maybe post them here.
Following up on the discussion we had at the AMR phone meeting today, the AMR corpus currently contains 8 instances of named entities with a metonymic use of capital cities to represent the government of the corresponding country.
Example:
List of cities (sometimes) annotated as a government-organization:
Is this what we want? Or is it just too tricky to draw the line?
Note that in the example sentence, South Korea in some way also stands in for some South Korean entity, but currently, no country is annotated as a government-organization or anything else hinting at metonymy.