Closed uhermjakob closed 10 years ago
At the AMR phone meeting on May 6, 2014, we decided to accept the proposals for cases 1, 2, and 4.
For case 3, we decided to annotate partner using have-rel-role-91 for partner for the sense boyfriend/girlfriend etc., otherwise we will use partner-01.
Examples added to AMR Dict.
Generally, the new frame have-rel-role-91 has greatly improved our AMRs. I noticed a few tricky cases, some with inconsistent annotations.
Here are my proposals, which we can discuss at our AMR phone meeting tomorrow.
Case 1: my ex
Proposal: We "hallucinate" the concept significant-other, a term that would cover all of husband, wife, domestic partner, boyfriend, girlfriend.
This would allow us to better follow existing precedent for terms such as ex-husband that use :time ex:
Note: Some annotators have used have-rel-role-91 :ARG2 ex.
Case 2: my baby
We use baby as the entity type and child as the relational role. Similarly: his girl
Case 3: my partner
Proposal: Follow general preference to use existing verb frames.
Alternative: use have-rel-role-91 :ARG2 partner, as for girlfriend, boyfriend, spouse. But it might be hard to separate a partner in the sense of a significant-other from the business partner in a narrow sense (co-owner or co-manager of a company) or in a wider sense (cooperation of two businesses).
Case 4: my family
Proposal: Use have-org-role-91/member construction. ("Mary is a member of the family.")
Alternatives: :part, :consist-of, have-rel-role-91