Open nschneid opened 9 years ago
right, this is a case of not representing everything. if "bob is a lobbyist", there's a good chance he does it professionally, but we don't represent that part of things. k
Indeed, but it's not just an issue of the professional vs. situational distinction: the roller skater who is wielding an axe and the axe-wielder who is on roller skates do not necessarily indicate a profession, but they differ in what is given vs. new information.
right! we're more about who's doing what to who, with what sort of edged weapon
Going beyond the investor examples in the guidelines, @obo has pointed out that an investor who lobbies and a lobbyist who invests would get the same AMR:
Is this worth pointing out in the guidelines document? It seems to me that it shows that AMR abstracts away from much of the information structure in English.