amrisi / amr-guidelines

250 stars 87 forks source link

Outdated guidelines examples with overly liberal paraphrases? #144

Open nschneid opened 9 years ago

nschneid commented 9 years ago

The following paraphrases from the guidelines seem to go beyond the sorts of canonicalizations actually made by AMR annotators (dropping negative polarity "any"; dropping "fail to"):

(h / have-01 
   :polarity -
   :ARG0 (i / i)
   :ARG1 (m / money))

I don’t have any money.

I have no money.

(e / eat-01
   :polarity -
   :ARG0 (p / person
            :mod (e / every)))

No one ate.

Every person failed to eat.

(The latter is example (3) in Bender et al.'s IWCS 2015 paper, which brought it to my attention.) Should these be removed?

kevincrawfordknight commented 9 years ago

the first example is good as is. agreed, i would remove "...failed..." as a realization of the second example.

nschneid commented 9 years ago

@kevincrawfordknight, do you think that "any" should be dropped in general? From a release search it looks like it's almost always in the AMR, e.g.:

[1] consensus isi_0002.139 (snt. 176 in workset guidelines, last updated on Wed Dec 5, 2012) He said he would support them as long as they didn't break any rules.

(s / say-01
      :ARG0 (h / he)
      :ARG1 (s2 / support-01
            :ARG0 h
            :ARG1 (t / they)
            :condition (a / as-long-as
                  :op1 (b / break-01 :polarity -
                        :ARG0 t
                        :ARG1 (r / rule
                              :mod (a2 / any))))))

[8] consensus wb.eng_0003.87 (snt. 87 in workset wb-eng-0003, last updated on Wed Dec 19, 2012) I have no desire to live in any city ,

(d / desire-01
  :ARG0 (i / i)
  :ARG1 (l / live-01
          :ARG0 i
          :location (c / city
                      :mod (a / any)))
  :polarity -)
kevincrawfordknight commented 9 years ago

maybe! (it should certainly be dropped in the "n't ... any" case you started with).

nschneid commented 9 years ago

Other cases to revisit:

nschneid commented 9 years ago

e26f5e620f75846d10520b1ce2c4308178f2cbf6 fixes the examples with lexical paraphrases and :beneficiary. Waiting for resolution of some of the other issues above.

nschneid commented 9 years ago

:mode expressive fixed in guidelines with #155