Open nschneid opened 9 years ago
A possible principle: :polarity -
goes under events, unless it is an existential clause. :quant
is only used if there is a modifier ("virtually no").
Decision: :polarity -
goes as high as possible. :quant (n / no)
and :mod (n / no)
examples should be fixed. "There are no people in the desert .", etc. should be (p / person :polarity - :ARG1-of (b / be-located-at-91 ...))
.
Thanks for pointing out these inconsistencies, Nathan.
I updated a number examples to be in line with our precedent for
There is no information on the case. (This is our primary precedent.)
(i / information :polarity -
:topic (c / case))
There are no people in the desert .
(p / person :polarity -
:location (d / desert))
No boy left. = There is no boy who left.
(b / boy :polarity -
:ARG0-of (l / leave-01))
There was virtually no traffic. (With reificaton of :polarity to accommodate virtually.)
(t / traffic
:ARG1-of (h / have-polarity-91
:ARG2 -
:degree (v / virtual)))
No state borders Alaska. = There is no state that borders Alaska.
(s / state :polarity -
:ARG1-of (b / border-01
:ARG2 (s2 / state :name (n / name :op1 "Alaska"))))
(Prompted by an audience question at the practice tutorial at Edinburgh:)
How do we treat something like "no state borders Alaska"?
:polarity -
,:quant
, or:mod
?There is conflicting evidence in a release search: