Open timjogorman opened 8 years ago
Perhaps this would be too obscure, but it seems to me that "X regardless of Y" or "X whether or not Y" means "X without having Y as a condition". So:
(c / continue-01
:ARG1-of (h / have-condition-91 :polarity -
:ARG2 (r / rain-01)))
If this is deemed too deep for annotators to apply consistently, then I vote for making a lexical frame like regardless-91
.
I agree that regardless goes beyond a simple :concession
.
I like both options 2 and 3, maybe option 2 slightly more:
... :concession (r / regardless :op1 (r / rain-01))
Either could be facilitated by a shortcut ... :regardless ...
-- Ulf
Decision at AMR phone meeting on Dec. 7, 2015:
We've noticed some discrepancies with how we do things like "regardless of", "irregardless of", "without regard to". This is cases like:
The different analyses vary: reducing everything to "the game will continue regardless of rain", I've noticed treatments like:
Option 1 : use :concession The most common treatment is :concession, but I think "regardless" has much different entailments -- (the complement of "regardless" doesn't necessarily happen, for example)
Option 2: Since this is similar to "even if", and we could follow the same structure we use there:
Option 3: Have an actual frame for this , regardless-91
Any thoughts or preferences on this? There are only about 40 examples total currently, so it's not a huge issue.