amrisi / amr-guidelines

250 stars 87 forks source link

Regardless of #162

Open timjogorman opened 8 years ago

timjogorman commented 8 years ago

We've noticed some discrepancies with how we do things like "regardless of", "irregardless of", "without regard to". This is cases like:

The different analyses vary: reducing everything to "the game will continue regardless of rain", I've noticed treatments like:

Option 1 : use :concession The most common treatment is :concession, but I think "regardless" has much different entailments -- (the complement of "regardless" doesn't necessarily happen, for example)

Option 2: Since this is similar to "even if", and we could follow the same structure we use there:

The game will continue even if it rains:
(c / continue-01 
      :ARG1 (g / game) 
      :concession (e / even-if 
            :op1 (r / rain-01))) 

The game will continue without regard to rain:
(c / continue-01 
      :ARG1 (g / game) 
      :concession (r / regardless 
            :op1 (r / rain-01))) 

Option 3: Have an actual frame for this , regardless-91

The game will continue without regard to rain:
(c / continue-01
      :ARG1 (g / game)
      :ARG1-of (r2 / regardless-91
            :ARG2 (r / rain-01)))

Any thoughts or preferences on this? There are only about 40 examples total currently, so it's not a huge issue.

nschneid commented 8 years ago

Perhaps this would be too obscure, but it seems to me that "X regardless of Y" or "X whether or not Y" means "X without having Y as a condition". So:

(c / continue-01
   :ARG1-of (h / have-condition-91 :polarity -
        :ARG2 (r / rain-01)))

If this is deemed too deep for annotators to apply consistently, then I vote for making a lexical frame like regardless-91.

uhermjakob commented 8 years ago

I agree that regardless goes beyond a simple :concession. I like both options 2 and 3, maybe option 2 slightly more: ... :concession (r / regardless :op1 (r / rain-01))

Either could be facilitated by a shortcut ... :regardless ...

-- Ulf

uhermjakob commented 8 years ago

Decision at AMR phone meeting on Dec. 7, 2015: