Closed nschneid closed 8 years ago
From searching the release data:
:time always
:frequency often
and :time often
:frequency sometimes
and :time sometimes
:frequency seldom
:polarity - :time ever
:mod usual
and :frequency usual
:ARG1-of rare-02
:ARG1-of frequent-02
:ARG1-of regular-02
:frequency occasional
and :time occasional
:frequency sporadic
Relatedly:
rate-entity-91
, :frequency time :mod every
, :time every
rate-entity-91
, :frequency time :mod each
, :time time :mod each
I think that always and sometimes/often are somewhat different.
While sometimes and often are a strong match to the question How often?, always more strongly matches the question When? * Tanks are always dangerous. * How often are tanks dangerous? (more weird IMO) * When are tanks dangerous? (less weird IMO)
:time as single time interval: * in 2016 (closed time interval) * until 2016 (half open time interval) * always (open time interval)
Other examples where always does not match How often? very well: * We can always hope. * I have always been very introverted. * She has always lived in China. * He always helped me when I needed his help.
One could of course argue that always implies once but I think that always carries much more information than once.
In the past, annotation of always has not always been fully consistent in the AMR corpus, with annotators using :time always, :mod always and :frequency always. Of these, :time always has been the most common annotation, and :frequency always the least common.
Now, the AMR Checker and the AMR auto repair scripts make sure that always is consistently annotated as :time always.
Hmm, good point that "How often?" is not always a natural question for "always". OTOH, I'm not sure "When?" is natural, either.
For "Tanks are always dangerous", without context, I think the most natural question would be "Which tanks are dangerous?" (All of them.)
For "We can always hope", "She has always lived in China", etc., I wonder if :duration
would be better??
Regarding the variation in annotations for "often", "sometimes", etc.: Do you think these reflect principled distinctions, or could they all be mapped to :frequency
?
(added "seldom", "regularly", "sporadically" to the list above)
Some inconsistency in annotated data -- need some guidelines and/or AMR checker enforcement.
The naacl-tutorial sentence that prompted this: "The executions are often public and almost always by hanging ." A bit weird to say :frequency often
but :time always
, since they have parallel roles in the sentence.
Each decision seems fairly consistent in the corpus. But it seems like "always" describes a frequency.