amrisi / amr-guidelines

240 stars 86 forks source link

Have-Degree-91 vs. Have-Quant-91 #190

Open cbonial opened 8 years ago

cbonial commented 8 years ago

I continued to consider "tests" for determining Degree/Quant in some ambiguous cases. I've used Nathan's suggested test below, and although it doesn't quite match up with my own intuitions in some cases, it does lead to a more conservative treatment that defaults to Degree. Please skim explanation, examples below and weigh in.

When to use Have-Degree-91 vs. Have-Quant-91

In general, Have-Degree-91 is used with gradeable properties, often expressed as an adjective (taller, less powerful, most totalitarian, etc) or adverb (more quickly, further). Have-Quant-91 is used with clear quantities of things, and those things are generally expressed as nouns and a quantifier (more money, less oversight, the most cars). Nonetheless, there can be some ambiguous overlap between the two. This list is meant to provide illustrative examples of when to use each. At the most basic level, consider: Is it a property or a quantity under discussion? If uncertain, Have-Degree-91 is a more general roleset than Have-Quant-91, so the default should beHave-Degree-91.

This test may be helpful in cases where the potential property/quantity word is ambiguous: the word should be modifiable by “many” or “much” if appropriate for Have-Quant-91: e.g.:

Examples:

These can be rephrased in the current, comparative form with "much": Memory is much less... and it's not very clear what the non-comparative form should be. I'm inclined to think of it more as a adjective predicate, and this gives us a degree reading:

These may be problematic for annotators, but perhaps just including a couple of examples like this is ok.