What frame to use to relate customers to companies? ("Starbucks customer", "customer of Starbucks", "Starbucks's customers")

amrisi / amr-guidelines

246 stars 86 forks source link

What frame to use to relate customers to companies? ("Starbucks customer", "customer of Starbucks", "Starbucks's customers") #191

Open nschneid opened 8 years ago

nschneid commented 8 years ago

Is this have-org-role-91, because the entity types are different (person/company)? Or is it have-rel-role-91, because the customer is not an employee or member, but rather engaging in a transaction with the organization? Similarly: "client". Not many examples in the corpus of "client" or "customer" with respect to a company (as opposed to an individual).

I guess the reverse role would be something like "provider", which has a verb frame.

kevincrawfordknight commented 8 years ago

"Starbucks customer" "Verizon wireless customer"

patronize-01? does it have a role for goods? (Tim: can add)
have-rel-role-91?

Ulf: AMR annotators currently just use "customer" as a concept (19 cases), except 3 cases used have-rel-role-91.

Ulf: have-rel-role, have-org-role usually persistent. Martha: Kind of agree w/persistent state.

Nathan: patronize-01 sounds good, esp if AMR Editor can suggest it. Tim: should we retrofit? Ulf: one more week!