Open ArchnaBhatia opened 11 years ago
2.---- Oops. Typo in guidelines. Should be :op2 (r / river). Corrected. Thanks.
3.---- scheme fills the :ARG1 slot for participate-01. The other AMR means something like "Co-scheming, he participated."
4.---- Our objective was to uniformly map "according to" to a verb frame. There were several possible choices. We picked say-01.
5.---- The verb frame for come-01 has no :ARG0.
6.---- I think both AMRs are ok. The consensus AMR emphasizes that worker stands for a "person who works". And "The boy is a hard-working person." matches our standard "X is Y" pattern, which we typically render as "Y :domain X".
7.---- Plan is a tricky word. We verbalize it when it describes a planning event. But for cases like "She selected the cell phone company's basic family plan." the meaning of "plan" is more that of a fee schedule.
8.---- and 9.---- Our objective was to represent non-exact quantities in a uniform way. We decided to have the "fuzzy operators" such as approximately X, more than X, between X and Y at the top, because they can have more than one :op (between). For more see http://www.isi.edu/~ulf/amr/lib/popup/quantities.html#non-exact-quantities
(4): The convention for government is to always use govern-01
so there will be roles available when, e.g., the region governed is present. So U.S. government would be interpreted as "government-organization that governs the U.S.". This is admittedly ugly, but it works.
"the boy is a hard worker"
focus only affects the very top concept. the rest is determined by semantic relations, using inverses when necessary. for the very top of an AMR, we have a test that sometimes works -- wrap "believe" or "saw" or something around your AMR.
we can wrap the possibilities:
(b / believe-01
:arg0 (i / i)
:arg1 (w / work-01
:ARG0 (b / boy)
:manner (h / hard)))
(b / believe-01
:arg0 (i / i)
:arg1 (p / person
:domain (b / boy)
:ARG0-of (w / work-01
:manner (h / hard))))
the former seems a little better.
(b / believe-01
:arg0 (i / i)
:arg1 (h / hard
:manner-of (w / work-01
:ARG0 (b / boy))))
i would go with #3, but #1 seems ok too.
it's more clear for "i saw that the rock was hard" (#3 style) versus "i saw a hard rock" (#2 style).
ps. when thinking about focus, we don't think about "nominal" or "clausal" or syntactic things like that.
1.----- The boy must not go. [isi_0001_5]
Annotator archna
Annotator consensus
QUESTION: Why do we not have an ARG1 for "obligate" - is it because we assume that we don't have 2 clauses here?
2.----- The man died between the house and the river. [isi_0001_21]
Annotator archna
Annotator consensus
QUESTION: Is there a principled way to determine if we will get the same relation op1 or different op1, op2 etc? In the following we get two different role names.
[35] consensus isi_0002.95 (snt. 132 in workset guidelines, last updated on Tue Jul 3, 2012) The performance will take between 45 minutes and an hour.
3.----- He was a participant in the scheme. [isi_0001_22]
Annotator archna
Annotator consensus
QUESTION: Why is "scheme" ARG1 of "participate"?
4.----- According to government sources, the killing happened yesterday. [isi_0001_23]
Annotator archna TOP: report-01
Annotator consensus TOP: say-01
QUESTION: Why do we have ARG0-of? Is that necessary?
5.----- The boy came and left. [isi_0001_24]
Annotator archna
Annotator consensus
QUESTION: Why is "boy" Arg1 instead of Arg0 for the predicate "come"? And do we differentiate between the unaccusative and unergative intransitive verbs for the PB labels here?
6.----- The boy is a hard worker. [isi_0001_25]
Annotator archna TOP: work-01
Annotator consensus TOP: person
QUESTION/COMMENT: I thought we would use "top person" when we want to express a noun phrase like "a hard worker (boy)" instead of a clause. If we have two ways to express this semantic content, we need to be consistent in whether we use one form or the other, I think we choose that depending on what is being focussed. If it is a nominal expression "a hard worker (boy)", the person is being focussed and the second annotation above seems better; but if it is clausal, the fact that the boy is a hard worker is focussed, so we use the first annotation above.
7.----- the earlier plan
QUESTION: This question is not that important but why do we not mark it as "plan-01"? Is it because it was not a verb but a noun?
8.----- several hundred boys [isi_0001_32]
Annotator archna
Annotator consensus
QUESTION: I'm not sure about this difference. I looked at the guidelines, I see we do it this (consensus) way, but I am just curious why we do it this way.
9.----- about 10 miles [isi_0001_35]
Annotator archna TOP: distance-quantity
Annotator consensus TOP: about
QUESTION: What is the difference between "about 10 miles" and "more than 4000 boys"/ "between 4000 and 5000 boys"? All are variations of quantities.