Closed research2010 closed 11 years ago
Hey. The textons are the result of clustering, right? So they can not be identified, can they? Cheers, Andy
Oh, Yes!!! I ignored it. The two results both have values which range 0 to 63. So, they all cluster the features into 64 clusters. Thanks.
you could actually try to compute the rand index between the two (flattened) images, which should be close to one (it's in scikit-learn sklearn.metrics.rand_score) There could be minor differences in the filters and the clustering is randomly initialized and so on, so I'm not sure there is really much of a point to doing this, as long as the results look good ;).
Hi Andreas, The textons seems not consistent with the result computed by MATLAB version of CPMC.
This is the original image form VOC dataset.
This is the result by CPMC matlab version.
This is the result by globalPb_mex.
I don't find what's wrong, could you give me some advice, please?