search

amusecode / AMUSE-Distributed

Distributed code for AMUSE project
Apache License 2.0
0 stars 1 forks source link

status of AMUSE-dstributed repo #26

Open ipelupessy opened 7 years ago

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

the current source in AMUSE is out of sync and more up to date then the NLeSc repo - the current situation with both (in tree and seperate repo) is not so nice, so either we should 1 drop the NleSc repo, make the code part of AMUSE only (ie delete the update target) 2 drop the AMUSE code, have it a downloadable code from the NLeSc repo 3 combine 1+2: drop the AMUSE code, have it a downloadable code but move the code to a seperate repo as part of the amuse project (so under amusecode)

nielsdrost commented 7 years ago

I vote 1 :-)

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

I have disabled the update in the AMUSE distributed makefile - maybe you can put a warning in the readme of the repo?

nielsdrost commented 7 years ago

Notice put in repo. We will probably remove this repo at some point.

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

ok, thanks!! i am still not sure whether to have a seperate repo (as part of amuse)...there may be more codes/ parts that will be seperated (like omuse is now)....also, there are still a few issues on the repo - I guess they are not going to be resolved anytime soon;-) it may be worthwhile to preserve/ document these...

nielsdrost commented 7 years ago

I can also transfer the repo to amusecode if you like. There is already a fork there however, so this may complicate matters.

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

ok, didn't realize you could do that..

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

I have removedthe fork..

nielsdrost commented 7 years ago

Great! Last think I need for a transfer is the (temporary) ability to create repo's on github.com/amusecode.

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

it may work now..

nielsdrost commented 7 years ago

It did :-) Case closed :-)

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

ok, nice..thanks!

nielsdrost commented 7 years ago

Interestingly enough I cannot close this issue due to lack of permissions ;-)

ipelupessy commented 7 years ago

ok, that should be fixed now;-) the repository defaults where read only for members... in any case, you can leave it open because the original issue is not fixed yet...