Closed RhoBott closed 3 years ago
Ah, interesting, is this a feminist critique of the word's etymology? Or just a redundancy critique?
Reasonable question, apologies for not being clearer. The former.
Great, thanks! I hadn't encountered that critique before, but now that I see it, it seems like a word well worth avoiding. Edits on their way.
Perhaps consider "foundational" (or formative, important, key, vital, central, earth-moving, game-changing, ground-breaking [or other noun-gerund combinations] ... ) instead of seminal?
Four appearances in text: ch 3
ch 4
ch 9