search

amzotall / webgrind

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/webgrind
Other
0 stars 0 forks source link

Request for better support of xdebug files #60

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
It's not really an issue, rather a request.

Webgrind uses 'summary' and 'runs' headers which does not exists in file 
generated by xdebug so total time is not shown at all.

Another problem is that when cost is set to "percent" and not mili- or 
micro-seconds then TotalSelftCost and TotalInclusionCost are always equal to 
zero. I guess it's because of missing total time.

Please try to make also other method of getting total time than searching for a 
header. I know sum of all other times is not always perfect solution but it's 
better than nothing ;)

Still, thanks for a great tool!

Original issue reported on code.google.com by akra...@gmail.com on 6 Oct 2010 at 6:30

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Webgrind was written specifically to support the format of Xdebug generated 
files. I am not able to reproduce any of your issues. Could you perhaps attach 
a sample xdebug file that exhibits the described problems for you so that I can 
test?

Original comment by gugakf...@gmail.com on 6 Oct 2010 at 12:52

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Example of my cachgrind file in the attachment. Together with webgrind file.

I use xdebug 2.1.0 on Apache 2.2.11. Let me know if you need more info.

Original comment by akra...@gmail.com on 6 Oct 2010 at 1:03

Attachments:

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
The problem with missing summary header seems to stem from calling "exit()" in 
the script. Can you confirm this?

This was filed as an Xdebug issue back in 2004 
(http://bugs.xdebug.org/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=68) and fixed but apparently 
reappeared at some point. A new bug has been filed 
(http://bugs.xdebug.org/view.php?id=631)

We'll wait for feedback from Derick until we decide if we should provide a 
workaround for webgrind

Original comment by gugakf...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2010 at 10:31

GoogleCodeExporter commented 8 years ago 
Might be :)

This script was generating Excel file and I think it was calling exit() at some 
point after file was generated.

Original comment by akra...@gmail.com on 27 Oct 2010 at 10:35