anacastrosalgado / TEI

1 stars 0 forks source link

JAÇO, article with grammatical information #11

Open anacastrosalgado opened 2 years ago

anacastrosalgado commented 2 years ago

JAÇO_morais_1

I was thinking of using only two <gloss>, but it is not valid. I used <sense> but am not satisfied with this solution. Any help?

<entry xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="MORAIS.1.DLP.JACO" type="mainEntry" xml:lang="pt">
   <form type="lemma">
      <orth>JAÇO</orth>
   </form>
   <metamark function="lemmaDelimiter">,</metamark>
   <sense xml:id="MORAIS.1.DLP.JACO.s.1">
      <gloss>primeira peſſoa do preſente indicativo de jazer</gloss>
   </sense>
   <metamark function="senseDelimiter">;</metamark>
   <sense xml:id="MORAIS.1.DLP.JACO.s.2">
      <form type="inflected">
         <orth>jaça</orth>
      </form>
      <pc>,</pc>
      <gloss>terceira peſſoa do preſente do ſubjuntivo</gloss>
   </sense>
   <cit type="example" xml:lang="pt">
      <bibl type="attestation" source="#Eufroſina">
         <title>Eufr.</title>
         <citedRange unit="act">2</citedRange>
         <pc>.</pc>
         <citedRange unit="scene">7</citedRange>
         <pc>.</pc>
      </bibl>
      <quote>jaço</quote>
   </cit>
   <pc>.</pc>
</entry>
laurentromary commented 2 years ago

Aren't these simply <def>'s ?

anacastrosalgado commented 2 years ago

No, dear Laurent, I don't want to tag it as <def> because it is just morphological information. Anything against <gloss> in this case?

laurentromary commented 2 years ago

I would say it is even less a gloss than a def. If you see it from a grammatical point of view use a gram, but there is also an editorial coherence with text in the same position in the dictionary that are normally def ’s (think of the issue of automatizing).

Le 3 déc. 2022 à 19:19, Ana Salgado @.***> a écrit :

No, dear Laurent, I don't want to tag it as because it is just morphological information. Anything against in this case?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/anacastrosalgado/TEI/issues/11#issuecomment-1336212240, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABH5B36MZFRBOHY3EZ2YGYLWLOFM5ANCNFSM6AAAAAASSV4DPQ. You are receiving this because you commented.

daliboris commented 2 years ago

What about this?

<entry xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="MORAIS.1.DLP.JACO" type="mainEntry" xml:lang="pt">
 <form type="inflected">
  <orth>JAÇO</orth>
 </form>
 <metamark function="lemmaDelimiter">,</metamark>
 <gramGrp>
  <gram type="person" value="1">primeira peſſoa</gram>
  <gram type="tense" value="present">do preſente</gram>
  <gram type="mood" value="indicative">indicativo</gram>
 </gramGrp>
 <lbl>de</lbl>
 <form type="lemma">
  <orth>jazer</orth>
 </form>
 <metamark function="lemmaDelimiter">;</metamark>
 <form type="inflected">
  <orth>jaça</orth>
 </form>
 <gramGrp>
  <gram type="person" value="3">terceira peſſoa</gram>
  <gram type="tense" value="present">do preſente</gram>
  <gram type="mood" value="subjunctive">do ſubjuntivo</gram>
 </gramGrp>
 <cit type="example" xml:lang="pt">
  <bibl type="attestation" source="#Eufroſina">
   <title>Eufr.</title>
   <citedRange unit="act">2</citedRange>
   <pc>.</pc>
   <citedRange unit="scene">7</citedRange>
   <pc>.</pc>
  </bibl>
  <quote>jaço</quote>
 </cit>
 <pc>.</pc>
</entry>

The problem may be: is JAÇO lemma, or inflected form?