At present, we can show "all the outputs of a cell" or "all the widgets of a cell" in a region.
However, the DOM would support rejiggering each of the .output_areas or widget that might have been serially displayed. Now, we can't let people start talking about output[0] but we can talk about 0 or more outputs.
With this, one could do a masonry-style layout, a treemap, a carousel (arg) or other kind of user- or data-driven layout, such that:
[display(Image(img) for img in glob("*.png"))]
would create a nice space-filling packing of the outputs.
The PART would probably be output and widget (vs outputs and widgets) and would take some more precise selector work.
Further, one still wouldn't be able to put output and outputs from a single cell on a single slide, but that seems reasonable.
At present, we can show "all the outputs of a cell" or "all the widgets of a cell" in a region.
However, the DOM would support rejiggering each of the
.output_areas orwidgetthat might have been serially displayed. Now, we can't let people start talking aboutoutput[0]but we can talk about 0 or more outputs.With this, one could do a masonry-style layout, a treemap, a carousel (arg) or other kind of user- or data-driven layout, such that:
would create a nice space-filling packing of the outputs.
The PART would probably be
outputandwidget(vsoutputsandwidgets) and would take some more precise selector work.Further, one still wouldn't be able to put
outputandoutputsfrom a single cell on a single slide, but that seems reasonable.