Closed lukechilds closed 8 years ago
LGTM
Can you add documentation as well?
Yeah, sure 👍
@LinusU done :)
Awesome, thanks for your contribution
LGTM
looks good, but I'm honestly not very happy w/ the entire chain of callbacks we're tacking onto it - that's outside of this PR
@badunk I'll submit a pull request to fix that as soon as this is merged, sounds good?
oh yeah for sure, thanks @LinusU
Yeah I agree, I threw up in my mouth a little when I saw that, I was just following the convention 😆
It could still be trimmed down quite a bit after your latest PR.
Also, just a suggestion, but instead of manually implementing all the stuff you wanna pass through to S3 (metadata, cache control, acl, content type etc) it might be worth having one s3Params
property that gets merged with the default S3 param object. That way people can add any options that the S3 lib supports without requiring any extra modifications to this lib.
Fixes #36