search

anagram4wander / VirtualizingObservableCollection

.NET PCL With Virtualizing Observable Collection
http://alphachitech.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/virtualizing-observable-collection/
56 stars 28 forks source link

Question about a license #9

Open pluskal opened 9 years ago

pluskal commented 9 years ago

Hello anagram4wander,

would it be possible to add an open-source license, best if it be https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT.

I would like to extend this project and include it in my open-source SW.

Thanks, JP

LeeHoward1 commented 8 years ago

Hi anagram4wander,

I too would like to know what license your code is released under. Specifically, I would need the license explicitly stated somewhere. A license file in the root directory is a typical way to do this. Please let me know if you don't intend to add a license, since I won't be able to use your code in that case.

Thanks,

Lee

anagram4wander commented 8 years ago

Open license - feel free to use it.

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:08 AM, LeeHoward1 notifications@github.com wrote:

Hi anagram4wander,

I too would like to know what license your code is released under. Specifically, I would need the license explicitly stated somewhere. A license file in the root directory is a typical way to do this. Please let me know if you don't intend to add a license, since I won't be able to use your code in that case.

Thanks,

Lee

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

LeeHoward1 commented 8 years ago

Thanks for the quick reply. I work for a company that requires any code we use to have a specified license. Would you consider applying one of the available licenses? Perhaps the MIT license, which essentially captures the "Open license" features?

anagram4wander commented 8 years ago

The mit license is fine.. I will update when I get a chance...

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 18, 2016, at 11:35 AM, LeeHoward1 notifications@github.com wrote:

Thanks for the quick reply. I work for a company that requires any code we use to have a specified license. Would you consider applying one of the available licenses? Perhaps the MIT license, which essentially captures the "Open license" features?

— You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub

LeeHoward1 commented 8 years ago

Okay, thank you!

WilhelmJP commented 7 years ago

Hello anagram4wander,

for the same reasons as Lee, I am also very interested in getting your lib in connection with the proposed MIT license. Could you please tell me if this is not possible in the near future?

Thanks, Wilhelm

sjb-sjb commented 7 years ago

I agree with the comments on licensing, which I see have been open for a year or so. We need a license posted on the GitHub page. It may be great software but without a posted license it is not usable.

michael-fraser-epm commented 1 year ago

The license file was never committed to the Main branch. Can someone please add the MIT license to the main branch?