Which scope/s are relevant/related to the feature request?
router
Information
This RFC proposes adding support for Custom URL Matchers within the existing filesystem-based routing of Analog. This feature would allow developers to define custom logic for URL pattern matching directly within .page.ts files, enabling more flexible and complex routing patterns.
Proposed Implementation:
Naming Pattern for Custom Matchers:
Introduce a naming convention or symbol (e.g., $) in .page.ts filenames to signify that the file contains a custom URL matcher.
For example, a file named [$example].page.ts would indicate that this route uses a custom matcher instead of relying on standard static or dynamic routing.
Matcher Defined Inside .page.ts:
Developers would define a custom matcher function, similar to Angular’s UrlMatcher. This function would return a UrlMatchResult if the URL matches the defined logic.
Which scope/s are relevant/related to the feature request?
router
Information
This RFC proposes adding support for Custom URL Matchers within the existing filesystem-based routing of Analog. This feature would allow developers to define custom logic for URL pattern matching directly within
.page.ts
files, enabling more flexible and complex routing patterns.Proposed Implementation:
Naming Pattern for Custom Matchers:
$
) in.page.ts
filenames to signify that the file contains a custom URL matcher.[$example].page.ts
would indicate that this route uses a custom matcher instead of relying on standard static or dynamic routing.Matcher Defined Inside
.page.ts
:Example:
Describe any alternatives/workarounds you're currently using
I'm using the provideRouter along with provideFileRouter
I would be willing to submit a PR to fix this issue