Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
Quick question: what happens if an application is using the ADC?
Original comment by razvanm
on 9 Jun 2011 at 4:21
Oh, everything still works and this isn't a hack -- we're just wiring down to
the bottom of the ADC stack.
If you wire VoltageC like ReprogramGuardC does now, you end up pulling in
Msp430InternalVoltageC, AdcReadNowClientC, AdcReadStreamClientC, AdcReadClientC
and so on down the line However at the end of the day you pull in
Msp430Adc12ClientAutoRVGC, the same thing I used -- that arbitrates access to
the ADC channel for sharing.
The only comment I would make is that it looks like my patch doesn't release
the resource when it's done, so it should be fixed...
Original comment by sdh...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2011 at 4:28
Original comment by philip.l...@gmail.com
on 17 Jun 2011 at 7:40
I can confirm that burn from apps/tests/deluge/Blink works fine with this
change. The decrease in ROM I got was 2638 bytes.
Current SVN head:
compiled BlinkAppC to build/telosb/main.exe
41420 bytes in ROM
1454 bytes in RAM
Current SVN head with the patch:
compiled BlinkAppC to build/telosb/main.exe
38782 bytes in ROM
1406 bytes in RAM
As Stephen said, the resource for Msp430Adc12ClientAutoRVGC is never released
by this patch and that needs to be fixed before it gets committed.
Note: I only have one telosb so I was not able to also test the burn-net script.
Original comment by raz...@musaloiu.com
on 26 Jul 2011 at 8:18
Original comment by philip.l...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2011 at 4:16
Not sure if the issue referred to in 50 was what I was talking about; as far as
I knew, all that needs to be done is call Resource.release() after reading a
sample; I don't know any bugs in Msp430Adc12ClientAutoRVGC. Here's the patch
that does what I was thinking. This is really only important if you *don't*
reprogram; if you do, it triggers a reboot so no one should ever care.
Original comment by sdh...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2011 at 9:35
Attachments:
The latest version of the patch looks good to me. Feel free to submit it. I
think issue 50 is is just a misunderstanding.
Original comment by razvanm
on 3 Aug 2011 at 2:58
Done!
Original comment by sdh...@gmail.com
on 3 Aug 2011 at 10:44
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
sdh...@gmail.com
on 9 Jun 2011 at 3:16Attachments: