Open OliverPStuart opened 3 years ago
My only suggestion is to make sure you have rARPACK and set partial_decomp = TRUE.
On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 8:18 PM Oliver Stuart @.***> wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to evaluate the three different methods shipped with this package on my data. The data is a 76x4623 matrix.
Estimating m with cv.lpca() is extremely slow for this size matrix, just the first iteration of the function at m=1 took >24 hours. Is there any way to speed this up? For now, I am just using logisticSVD() which takes <1 minute, but I am interested to compare the different approaches.
Best, Ollie
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/andland/logisticPCA/issues/25, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAZTGLRXUIQWAIMR63PXGTLTZSSXDANCNFSM5A7BRE3Q .
Hi,
I'm trying to evaluate the three different methods shipped with this package on my data. The data is a 76x4623 matrix.
Estimating
m
withcv.lpca()
is extremely slow for this size matrix, just the first iteration of the function atm=1
took >24 hours. Is there any way to speed this up? For now, I am just usinglogisticSVD()
which takes <1 minute, but I am interested to compare the different approaches.Best, Ollie