Open denismaier opened 3 years ago
Isn't this too English-dependent/focused? I don't really see how this would work in a language-agnostic way -- in morphologically rich(er) languages you could have several additional cases like dative, accusative etc.
Isn't this too English-dependent/focused? I don't really see how this would work in a language-agnostic way -- in morphologically rich(er) languages you could have several additional cases like dative, accusative etc.
Yes, that's probably correct. I don't have a good suggestion ATM.
When using in-text citation you sometimes may want to have the author of a paper in the possessive form:
Should this be supported? Related pandoc issue: https://github.com/jgm/pandoc/issues/7385
Should be much easier to support this with the new org syntax than with pandoc's design philosophy in mind.