Closed jkitchin closed 3 years ago
Yes, label rendering indeed depends on the style and there is a canonical CSL list of locators that can be the value of the label
field -- see the latest version here. Label normalization is based, as you write, on the alist in oc-csl.el
(which actually mimics pandoc's mapping).
I am not sure I am doing this right. Suppose I have this org-file, which tangles the test.bib file out, and has chicago-author-date-16th-edition.csl and locales-en-US.xml in the same directory.
I would have thought this would render as
(See Kitchin 2015, pg. 2)
, but it doesn't. Am I doing something wrong with the label? or does it depend on the style used?[EDIT]: I see it does depend on the style. With apa-5th-edition.csl, it renders as
(See Kitchin, 2015, p. 2)
, but only when you use "page" as the label, if you use "pg." or "p." or "p" then it renders as(See Kitchin, 2015, 2)
. Is that intentional, or documented somewhere?[EDIT 2]: I can further see that in oc-csl.el, it has an alist to standardize the label in those cases I mentioned to page. That seems like an ok thing to do. If that is the answer, feel free to close this.