Talking with @austin-rausch, it was clear my dense writing is making things are harder to grok. I've simplified the README language, slowing introducing new concepts instead of assuming a FP/Elm background. But even then, looking back, I must have been expecting people to Rain Man this document.
I have also removed the type annotations. While still valid, they don't really explain anything new that the new architecture section doesn't unless you solely think in types. I certainly don't want to scary people away with those.
Talking with @austin-rausch, it was clear my dense writing is making things are harder to grok. I've simplified the README language, slowing introducing new concepts instead of assuming a FP/Elm background. But even then, looking back, I must have been expecting people to Rain Man this document.
I have also removed the type annotations. While still valid, they don't really explain anything new that the new architecture section doesn't unless you solely think in types. I certainly don't want to scary people away with those.