Closed cbenz closed 1 year ago
Hi, thanks for opening the issue.
I'm creating this issue because I do not really see any use case where using the default nitpick style makes sense. If not, I'm curious about that.
The use case is/was: I use the default style myself. 😅
But you're right, it makes more sense to fail when no style is configured.
And then ask the user to run nitpick init
to initialise the repo.
:tada: This issue has been resolved in version 0.35.0 :tada:
The release is available on:
v0.35.0
Your semantic-release bot :package::rocket:
Problem
I installed nitpick in my project, but I forget to configure the
style =
key in[tool.nitpick]
, so when I rannitpick fix
it used the default nitpick style which created apackage.json
,.github/
directory, etc. which I do not need.Possible solution
I would have expected the tool to fail and tell me to explicitly configure a style.
I'm creating this issue because I do not really see any use case where using the default nitpick style makes sense. If not, I'm curious about that.