andrewiggins / tachometer-reporter-action

Report the results of Polymer/tachometer in a comment for PRs
MIT License
20 stars 4 forks source link

Bump node-fetch from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1 #24

Closed dependabot[bot] closed 3 years ago

dependabot[bot] commented 3 years ago

Bumps node-fetch from 2.6.0 to 2.6.1.

Release notes

Sourced from node-fetch's releases.

v2.6.1

This is an important security release. It is strongly recommended to update as soon as possible.

See CHANGELOG for details.

Changelog

Sourced from node-fetch's changelog.

v2.6.1

This is an important security release. It is strongly recommended to update as soon as possible.

  • Fix: honor the size option after following a redirect.
Commits
  • b5e2e41 update version number
  • 2358a6c Honor the size option after following a redirect and revert data uri support
  • 8c197f8 docs: Fix typos and grammatical errors in README.md (#686)
  • 1e99050 fix: Change error message thrown with redirect mode set to error (#653)
  • 244e6f6 docs: Show backers in README
  • 6a5d192 fix: Properly parse meta tag when parameters are reversed (#682)
  • 47a24a0 chore: Add opencollective badge
  • 7b13662 chore: Add funding link
  • 5535c2e fix: Check for global.fetch before binding it (#674)
  • 1d5778a docs: Add Discord badge
  • Additional commits viewable in compare view
Maintainer changes

This version was pushed to npm by akepinski, a new releaser for node-fetch since your current version.


Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR: - `@dependabot rebase` will rebase this PR - `@dependabot recreate` will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it - `@dependabot merge` will merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot squash and merge` will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it - `@dependabot cancel merge` will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging - `@dependabot reopen` will reopen this PR if it is closed - `@dependabot close` will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually - `@dependabot ignore this major version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this minor version` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot ignore this dependency` will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself) - `@dependabot use these labels` will set the current labels as the default for future PRs for this repo and language - `@dependabot use these reviewers` will set the current reviewers as the default for future PRs for this repo and language - `@dependabot use these assignees` will set the current assignees as the default for future PRs for this repo and language - `@dependabot use this milestone` will set the current milestone as the default for future PRs for this repo and language You can disable automated security fix PRs for this repo from the [Security Alerts page](https://github.com/andrewiggins/tachometer-reporter-action/network/alerts).
github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

πŸ“Š Tachometer Benchmark Results

Summary

  • test-bench-1: unsure πŸ” -10% - +12% (-4.10ms - +5.24ms)
    local-framework vs base-framework
  • test-bench-2: slower ❌ 8% - 35% (3.22ms - 11.96ms)
    base-framework vs other-framework Customize summary

Results

test-bench-1
VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework32.09ms - 38.19ms-faster βœ”
8% - 27%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
faster βœ”
9% - 28%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
base-framework39.60ms - 45.87msslower ❌
8% - 35%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
-unsure πŸ”
-12% - +9%
-5.24ms - +4.10ms
local-framework39.84ms - 46.76msslower ❌
9% - 38%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
unsure πŸ”
-10% - +12%
-4.10ms - +5.24ms
-
test-bench-2
VersionAvg timevs other-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-frameworkvs fast-framework
other-framework43.30ms - 52.48ms-slower ❌
19% - 54%
7.24ms - 18.26ms
unsure πŸ”
-1% - +26%
-0.40ms - +10.72ms
unsure πŸ”
-3% - +24%
-1.15ms - +10.34ms
base-framework39.60ms - 45.87msslower ❌
8% - 35%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
-unsure πŸ”
-22% - -0%
-10.72ms - +0.40ms
unsure πŸ”
-12% - +9%
-5.24ms - +4.10ms
local-framework39.84ms - 46.76msslower ❌
9% - 38%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
unsure πŸ”
-21% - +2%
-10.34ms - +1.15ms
-unsure πŸ”
-10% - +12%
-4.10ms - +5.24ms
fast-framework32.09ms - 38.19msfaster βœ”
17% - 36%
7.24ms - 18.26ms
faster βœ”
8% - 27%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
faster βœ”
9% - 28%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
-

tachometer-reporter-action for PR Setup Job Flow

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

πŸ“Š Tachometer Benchmark Results

Summary

  • test_bench: unsure πŸ” -10% - +12% (-4.10ms - +5.24ms)
    local-framework vs base-framework

Results

test_bench
VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework32.09ms - 38.19ms-faster βœ”
8% - 27%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
faster βœ”
9% - 28%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
base-framework39.60ms - 45.87msslower ❌
8% - 35%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
-unsure πŸ”
-12% - +9%
-5.24ms - +4.10ms
local-framework39.84ms - 46.76msslower ❌
9% - 38%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
unsure πŸ”
-10% - +12%
-4.10ms - +5.24ms
-

tachometer-reporter-action for PR Multi Init Flow

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

πŸ“Š Tachometer Benchmark Results

Summary

duration

  • multi-bench-1: faster βœ” 4% - 8% (6.30ms - 13.34ms)
    local-framework vs base-framework
  • multi-bench-2: slower ❌ 9% - 17% (0.32ms - 0.59ms)
    base-framework vs fast-framework Customize summary

window.usedJSHeapSize

  • multi-bench-1: slower ❌ 91% - 91% (3.25ms - 3.26ms)
    local-framework vs base-framework
  • multi-bench-2: faster βœ” 8% - 8% (0.09ms - 0.09ms)
    base-framework vs fast-framework Customize summary

Results

multi-bench-1

duration

VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework137.71ms - 141.73ms-faster βœ”
20% - 22%
34.69ms - 39.26ms
faster βœ”
14% - 18%
23.26ms - 31.06ms
base-framework175.60ms - 177.79msslower ❌
24% - 28%
34.69ms - 39.26ms
-slower ❌
4% - 8%
6.30ms - 13.34ms
local-framework163.53ms - 170.22msslower ❌
16% - 22%
23.26ms - 31.06ms
faster βœ”
4% - 8%
6.30ms - 13.34ms
-

window.usedJSHeapSize

VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework2.61ms - 2.61ms-faster βœ”
27% - 27%
0.95ms - 0.95ms
faster βœ”
62% - 62%
4.20ms - 4.21ms
base-framework3.56ms - 3.57msslower ❌
36% - 37%
0.95ms - 0.95ms
-faster βœ”
48% - 48%
3.25ms - 3.26ms
local-framework6.81ms - 6.82msslower ❌
161% - 161%
4.20ms - 4.21ms
slower ❌
91% - 91%
3.25ms - 3.26ms
-
multi-bench-2

duration

VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework3.46ms - 3.70ms-faster βœ”
8% - 15%
0.32ms - 0.59ms
slower ❌
34% - 54%
0.89ms - 1.28ms
base-framework3.98ms - 4.10msslower ❌
9% - 17%
0.32ms - 0.59ms
-slower ❌
52% - 72%
1.38ms - 1.71ms
local-framework2.34ms - 2.65msfaster βœ”
26% - 35%
0.89ms - 1.28ms
faster βœ”
34% - 42%
1.38ms - 1.71ms
-

window.usedJSHeapSize

VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework1.09ms - 1.09ms-slower ❌
9% - 9%
0.09ms - 0.09ms
slower ❌
11% - 11%
0.11ms - 0.11ms
base-framework1.00ms - 1.00msfaster βœ”
8% - 8%
0.09ms - 0.09ms
-slower ❌
2% - 2%
0.02ms - 0.02ms
local-framework0.98ms - 0.98msfaster βœ”
10% - 10%
0.11ms - 0.11ms
faster βœ”
2% - 2%
0.02ms - 0.02ms
-

tachometer-reporter-action for PR Multi-Measurement Setup Job Flow

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

πŸ“Š Tachometer Benchmark Results

Summary

  • test_bench: unsure πŸ” -10% - +12% (-4.10ms - +5.24ms)
    local-framework vs base-framework

Results

test_bench
  • Browser: chrome-headless 83.0.4103.116
  • Sample size: 60
  • Built by: PR Single Job #30
  • Commit: fbba5af
VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework32.09ms - 38.19ms-faster βœ”
8% - 27%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
faster βœ”
9% - 28%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
base-framework39.60ms - 45.87msslower ❌
8% - 35%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
-unsure πŸ”
-12% - +9%
-5.24ms - +4.10ms
local-framework39.84ms - 46.76msslower ❌
9% - 38%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
unsure πŸ”
-10% - +12%
-4.10ms - +5.24ms
-

tachometer-reporter-action v2 for PR Single Job

github-actions[bot] commented 3 years ago

πŸ“Š Tachometer Benchmark Results

Summary

  • test_bench: unsure πŸ” -10% - +12% (-4.10ms - +5.24ms)
    local-framework vs base-framework
  • test_bench_2: slower ❌ 8% - 35% (3.22ms - 11.96ms)
    base-framework vs other-framework Customize summary

Results

test_bench
VersionAvg timevs fast-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-framework
fast-framework32.09ms - 38.19ms-faster βœ”
8% - 27%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
faster βœ”
9% - 28%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
base-framework39.60ms - 45.87msslower ❌
8% - 35%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
-unsure πŸ”
-12% - +9%
-5.24ms - +4.10ms
local-framework39.84ms - 46.76msslower ❌
9% - 38%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
unsure πŸ”
-10% - +12%
-4.10ms - +5.24ms
-
test_bench_2
VersionAvg timevs other-frameworkvs base-frameworkvs local-frameworkvs fast-framework
other-framework43.30ms - 52.48ms-slower ❌
19% - 54%
7.24ms - 18.26ms
unsure πŸ”
-1% - +26%
-0.40ms - +10.72ms
unsure πŸ”
-3% - +24%
-1.15ms - +10.34ms
base-framework39.60ms - 45.87msslower ❌
8% - 35%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
-unsure πŸ”
-22% - -0%
-10.72ms - +0.40ms
unsure πŸ”
-12% - +9%
-5.24ms - +4.10ms
local-framework39.84ms - 46.76msslower ❌
9% - 38%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
unsure πŸ”
-21% - +2%
-10.34ms - +1.15ms
-unsure πŸ”
-10% - +12%
-4.10ms - +5.24ms
fast-framework32.09ms - 38.19msfaster βœ”
17% - 36%
7.24ms - 18.26ms
faster βœ”
8% - 27%
3.22ms - 11.96ms
faster βœ”
9% - 28%
3.55ms - 12.77ms
-

tachometer-reporter-action v2 for PR Multi Init Flow