Closed remigius42 closed 6 years ago
Thanks for the contribution! I published the role incorporating this change to the galaxy as v4.0.2.
Dear @andrewrothstein , thank you for merging and releasing the change.
Unfortunately, I am affraid my changes broke version v4.0.2:
There is an open Ansible issue #18417 about the variable resolution when using include_vars
and with_first_found
.
When I was looking at your other roles to mimic your coding style, I was wondering why you used the paths
parameter, for example in ansible-bash, because I figured the directory would be resolved automatically, which turned out to be true, alas the parent role's directory is resolved first.
I opened the pull request #19 to fix it; local tests referring to my fork with the patch seemed to be working.
Sorry for the inconvenience and best regards Andreas
I should have caught that. Sorry. It's been resolved in v4.0.3.
Dear Andrew
First let me thank your for providing your well-written and helpful Ansible roles under a permissive license.
For setting up a basic environment for data science tasks, I am including your
ansible-anaconda
role as a dependency. As I intend to support Mac OS X as well, I wanted to test it on Travis too. I am not sure, if this is of any interest to you, but since you are including the Mac OS X binaries and hashes in your role, I figured I would open a pull request based on the Travis configuration I am using for my data_science_base role. I tried to keep the changes to a minimum and to follow your coding style where possible.As an aside, when including
ansible-anaconda
, I realized that the version published on Ansible Galaxy isv4.0.0
, while the latest release in the GitHub repository isv4.0.1
, which includes the updates to Anaconda 5.0.1. Is there a particular reason, why the latest GitHub release is not pushed to Ansible Galaxy yet?Thank you & best regards Andreas