Closed QinqinHuang closed 6 years ago
Hi Qinqin,
You are right, I hate zero p-values and I set them to .Machine$double.xmin
in Matrix eQTL.
I agree with you on the order of the output. It's an easy fix.
I'll commit the update to Github tonight.
Thank you.
Andrey
I've committed the update. I'm closing this issue now.
Thanks Andrey!
Hi Andrey, Thanks for this amazing tool! In the output of Matrix eQTL, the most significant association ranks the first. When I was using it to map eQTLs in my simulated datasets, I found that some associations had different t-statistics but the same p-value (I think they may reach the minimum that can be calculated/displayed by R: 2.225074e-308). For these associations (or SNPs, they were for the same eGene), they are ordered by genomic locations. I was wondering whether it would make more sense if these SNPs could be sorted by t-statstics, which indicate significance levels. Best, Qinqin