search

andyp123 / blender_vhacd

Blender 2.80 add-on that enables the use of V-HACD inside Blender to generate accurate convex hulls quickly.
GNU General Public License v3.0
109 stars 22 forks source link

blender_2.92.0_vhacd can't run #12

Closed king40168 closed 2 years ago

king40168 commented 3 years ago

it seems that this plugin does not work. After importing the model, the plugin does not seem to work (maybe my plugin is not set well, but I do not know what the problem is). Windows10 with Blender v 2.92.0 (also tied blender v2.80)

image

ghost commented 3 years ago

I have the same issue. Can't see the context menu of the plugin (Blender 2.92, MacOS)

king40168 commented 3 years ago

I have the same issue. Can't see the context menu of the plugin (Blender 2.92, MacOS)

Maybe I have found the method, operation steps: press "N", select the tool, then select the plug-in of VHACD, open the plug-in, select your model, press "F3", enter V-hacd to search for the plug-in you want to call, and then select the parameters, and that's it

Stinger05189 commented 3 years ago

I have the same issue. Can't see the context menu of the plugin (Blender 2.92, MacOS)

Maybe I have found the method, operation steps: press "N", select the tool, then select the plug-in of VHACD, open the plug-in, select your model, press "F3", enter V-hacd to search for the plug-in you want to call, and then select the parameters, and that's it

image

I believe I'm having the same issue. Plugin is not working at all.

tpdickso commented 3 years ago

If your issue is that you aren't able to find the operator in the menu, then https://github.com/andyp123/blender_vhacd/pull/8 will fix your issue. Unfortunately it looks like this repo isn't maintained so you may have to pull directly from the branch.

andyp123 commented 2 years ago

I've merged in your pull request now @tpdickso , so thanks to you, this issue should be fixed. Custom operators always show up in my search menu (perhaps due to some setting somewhere) so I never noticed it wasn't accessible. Thanks for the help.