Open hituzi-no-sippo opened 4 years ago
Hello @hitsuji-no-shippo. I think the license in the main repo is the one that matters, so it's MIT.
Hi @hugomn . Thank you for the response.
Does the main repository license refer to the following code?
I didn't know because the repository root doesn't have LICENSE.
@angeloocana
I would be very happy to respond to this issue or add gatsby-plugin-i18n/LICENSE
@hitsuji-no-shippo I think the license field inside package.json is also ok. ;)
@angeloocana we can close this one.
I am an English learner I'm sorry if it's hard to understand.
The following three packages have different licenses for pacakge.json and LICENSE. Which is correct?