search

angjunkang / pe

0 stars 0 forks source link

Inconsistency for using invalid index syntax for edit command #8

Open angjunkang opened 1 year ago

angjunkang commented 1 year ago

Usage of index (99) above the current available index gives an intended error which states "The person index provided is invalid"

image.png

However, the usage of 0 as an index states "Invalid command format". Perhaps could use the same validation for both cases.

image.png

nus-pe-bot commented 1 year ago

Your response not required for this bug as the team has accepted the bug as it is.