Open angjunkang opened 1 year ago
Usage of index (99) above the current available index gives an intended error which states "The person index provided is invalid"
However, the usage of 0 as an index states "Invalid command format". Perhaps could use the same validation for both cases.
Your response not required for this bug as the team has accepted the bug as it is.
Usage of index (99) above the current available index gives an intended error which states "The person index provided is invalid"
However, the usage of 0 as an index states "Invalid command format". Perhaps could use the same validation for both cases.