angryip / ipscan

Angry IP Scanner - fast and friendly network scanner
angryip.org
GNU General Public License v2.0
4.2k stars 727 forks source link

Feature Request - IP Sort Order #164

Open cspacone opened 5 years ago

cspacone commented 5 years ago

under Tools/Preferences/Display add sticky preference -

Sort Order: Natural [ ], Ascending [ ], Descending [ ]

Where Natural [X] - sets the current default sort order behaviour of AngryIP Ascending [X] - sets sort order from lowest IP to highest IP Descending [X] - sets sort order from highest IP to lowest IP

Apologies if this has already been asked for and deferred or rejected.

Excellent work!

angryziber commented 5 years ago

Hi! You can already sort like this by pressing on the IP header, but only the scan has finished. Reordering is quite hard to achieve while scan is running, so this feature is disabled at that time.

cspacone commented 5 years ago

Apply the setting after the sort? I don't expect the scanner to sort on the fly as it is scanning, just change the default display once the scan / threads complete. But as you say, I could always do a pull and code it myself, except that I'm lacking in those skills. Anton, thank you for your scanner, it has saved me loads of time and is very convenient. -Chris

-----------------------------------------From: "Anton Keks" 

To: "angryip/ipscan" Cc: "cspacone", "Author" Sent: Monday December 24 2018 4:30:29AM Subject: Re: [angryip/ipscan] Feature Request - IP Sort Order (#164)

Hi! You can already sort like this by pressing on the IP header, but

only the scan has finished. Reordering is quite hard to achieve while scan is running, so this feature is disabled at that time.

You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub [1], or mute the thread [2].

Links:

[1] https://github.com/angryip/ipscan/issues/164#issuecomment-449728531 [2] https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATWJrOWsyoMXfx26M709UypBT-BhqasRks5u8MjlgaJpZM4ZeWZv

angryziber commented 5 years ago

Does the click on IP header work for you?

cspacone commented 5 years ago

Yes, it works fine. What I had hoped to make the case for (and clearly failed to do so) was setting the post-scan behavior of the IP list to sort (natural, ascending or descending) based on a setting in preferences.

Please feel free to ignore and close this request.

-Chris

From: Anton Keks notifications@github.com Sent: Tuesday, December 25, 2018 04:32 To: angryip/ipscan ipscan@noreply.github.com Cc: cspacone cspacone@socal.rr.com; Author author@noreply.github.com Subject: Re: [angryip/ipscan] Feature Request - IP Sort Order (#164)

Does the click on IP header work for you?

— You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/angryip/ipscan/issues/164#issuecomment-449846767 , or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATWJrD-5UfyJSp7wLYO0Kc18UE5Y5Lzkks5u8hrZgaJpZM4ZeWZv . https://github.com/notifications/beacon/ATWJrJyvBGiEB0FqEMSfJQvHcV-3m_soks5u8hrZgaJpZM4ZeWZv.gif

maximlomans commented 5 years ago

I have the same issue, i just can't go through all the ip's listed in the settings tab , the cursor doesn't move any further nor those the window enlarge .I can't se which ports are listed by default nor can i edit them

anasazi-970 commented 4 years ago

Ever since using the earliest Windows versions that did sort at the end (it seemed?) I have missed this feature. I'm a Linux user now days. A post sort option as suggested in this thread would be superb to an already great utility. I am so used to scanning (with my eyes) down the list to see if all my little devices and kiosk's and NAS's are up and running by saying hi to them. I looked at the source code, I probably could do it, I saw a call to a sort function in the ping fetcher code file. What I couldn't find is a place in the main line code that would know the sort is done and puts up that 'stats box' at the end. Would love some pointers on doing it... Thx. All

JoeBarouneD commented 4 years ago

I agree, manually clicking to sort after a scan is annoying ...