Closed flensrocker closed 3 months ago
Hi Lars, thanks for the PR. We are more than just OK, if you find look for improvements.
I took a look at the other extensions and their name mappings are not so straight forward like the one in withCallState
.
So for now this is all I have to contribute. But since I just started writing my own extensions to the signal-store, I maybe come back later with more PRs.
Thanks Lars!
This is a suggestion for an easier mapping of the state and signal types to the named (collection) types.
If you're ok with this I can take a look at the other mappings.
I've also reordered them so that the dependent type comes first.