Closed joscha closed 9 years ago
I don't think that's the right approach. We'd have to generate built files in every commit which would bump repo size significantly. A way to do it is to only generate those files for releases and put them in detached commits but that creates a maintenance burden.
Because of that and because npm is going to slowly replace bower, I think a bower package for this should be managed in a separate repository.
That's up to @btford, though.
+1 for separate repository.
I hear you - a separate repo would also allow for more easy (automatic) bumping of versions separately from the component itself and limit the clutter in the "ignore" section of bower.json
. @btford, what do you thin? Should I just go ahead and create such a repo or do you think it should be under the "angular" github hat?
+1 @mzgol , this is the usual way that angular does. Also need to add gulp tasks to bump version, push to bower repos and cdn etc.
Angular is moving away from Bower and toward NPM. Sorry folks.
Our project only exposes bower components to the web and not npm modules. As I would like to depend upon angular-hint without adding an extra build step, a bower component would be the easiest way to manage this dependency. Therefore I propose to expose the browserified
hint.js
via bower package. As I am not sure whether this should be happening in a separate repositiory instead and/or if anyone agrees this is a general use-case, I am opening this PR for general discussion.