> 10) Lines 316, 317, 359: Is "Bearer out-of-scope [voucher]" the same
> as "Bearer Voucher"? Presumably you mean that Bearer Vouchers are out
> of scope. Why not simply omit them from the table then and state that
> separately - this would be clearer. As a side note, this is the only
> place where the TOFU term is mentioned; since it is scope is it really
> needed (see also comment 5)?