> 13) Section 5: I am wondering if it would make sense to divide Section
> 5 into 2 subsections: One providing background (circa lines 370 to at
> least 403, or possibly as far as 427 or so), another summarizing the
> actual updates that were made? This would seem both clearer and
> cleaner than what it is now.
> 14) Line 384: Do you have a reference for the consortia?
It was https://openconnectivity.org/developer/specifications/fairhair/ I'm not sure I want to link to it in a reference, but we could do that.