feat: credential selection in proof request

[TimoGlastra]

This supersedes #71 and adds credential selection. It's a bit meh as you can't really see the credential you're selection.

So I had two potential ideas:

• merge as is (with the known UX flaws)
• disable credential selection still in the UI for now, but then we at least have the logic in place to add it in later

Works with both DIDComm and OpenID4VC.

@berendsliedrecht @janrtvld WDYT?

https://github.com/animo/paradym-wallet/assets/23165168/298474bb-f76f-4e03-9642-d2aeed3cf931

[TimoGlastra]

As you can see in the last commit, I disabled it for now in the UI. We can enable it again soon when we reworked the UX / design for selecting a credential

[berendsliedrecht]

@TimoGlastra do you need an additional review on this?

[TimoGlastra]

No it's ok 👍

[TimoGlastra]

I've updated this with the grouping, but have improved upon it a bit. We prefer grouping by CREDENTIAL, as it's what we use in Paradym and otherwise if all the matches for a requested entry match. In most cases I think this should suffice. And we will filter the matches so it correctly shows the options if selection is enabled that can be used for all credentials in the group.

There is one case that is not catched by this, and this is when you request a predicate and values from the same credential basically, but without the CREDENTIAL prefix in group name. This can gives multiple separate optoins ,but I feel this is more a limitation of AnonCreds proof requests, which we have now sovled using the CREDENTIAL prefix

There has been some pushback on adding this feature to AnonCreds v1, so I think our 'workaround' is fine here. https://github.com/hyperledger/anoncreds-rs/issues/292

[TimoGlastra]

Adding a "received on XXX" will probably already help a lot with being able to distinguish credentials when selecting