Closed TimoGlastra closed 1 year ago
Do you think we should show the supported did methods? Might be nice to check out the unresolver for some inspiration.
Merging #123 (e754cc6) into main (ea90fdb) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is
n/a
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #123 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 76.74% 76.74%
=======================================
Files 11 11
Lines 43 43
Branches 3 3
=======================================
Hits 33 33
Misses 10 10
:mega: We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more
Do you think we should show the supported did methods? Might be nice to check out the unresolver for some inspiration.
Yeah that's a good idea. I tried to extract them based on the registered ones, but it's quite hard to do in 0.3.x. If we update to 0.4.x it would be simpler to extract the registered methods.
Do you think we should show the supported did methods? Might be nice to check out the unresolver for some inspiration.
Yeah that's a good idea. I tried to extract them based on the registered ones, but it's quite hard to do in 0.3.x. If we update to 0.4.x it would be simpler to extract the registered methods.
Alrighty, can you create an issue and then we will pick it up later :).
Do you think we should show the supported did methods? Might be nice to check out the unresolver for some inspiration.
Yeah that's a good idea. I tried to extract them based on the registered ones, but it's quite hard to do in 0.3.x. If we update to 0.4.x it would be simpler to extract the registered methods.
Alrighty, can you create an issue and then we will pick it up later :).
Adds support resolving did documents. Wasn't 100% about how to show the form + then the JSON of the did document. Any feedback on how to display it differently is welcome!
Trying to add some screenshots but internet is scarce...
https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/23165168/232320616-943fdcf2-a5f2-4e47-a37a-ad6c5bdf13a5.mov