Closed david-allison closed 9 months ago
NOTE:
may want another admonition: https://docs.asciidoctor.org/asciidoc/latest/blocks/admonitions/I thought about having version-based structure ("removed in 2.17") vs what you have done which is feature-based structure ("this thing was removed" - then note what version). I don't think it really matters, and feature-based works well for me
I like all the in-document structure. So as far as I'm concerned this is 99.9% there
I thought about having version-based structure ("removed in 2.17") vs what you have done which is feature-based structure ("this thing was removed" - then note what version). I don't think it really matters, and feature-based works well for me
I like all the in-document structure. So as far as I'm concerned this is 99.9% there
I also considered it. I like
Going with it - fixups are easy if needed as this stuff publishes fully-auto. Awesome to close off some easy ones!
Adds a 'removed-features' page
I am (lazily) awaiting CI to test the rendering of the page.
I suspect that we'll want to bikeshed the color inversion CSS, if this takes a long time, let's split it out into another PR
filter: invert(1) might be a better recommendation, as it means users do not need to concern themselves with HTML color codes. I don't know whether this fully approximates our pervious inversion code.