JRuby? - Githubissues

ankiit / logstash

Automatically exported from code.google.com/p/logstash

0 stars 0 forks source link

JRuby? #37

Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

1.8/1.9 are failures of engineering quality.

JRuby might be a nice escape and also give us:

* proper threads (for multicore)
* full access to java (useful if ruby fails us)
* a boatload of libraries (ruby + java)
* great debugging tools (jvm)
* good performance (hotspot)

We'll probably want to decide this before 1.0.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jls.semi...@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2011 at 3:28

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

petef did some good work last night making jls-grok use ffi instead of Ruby C 
so we can use the grok filter from jruby.

Tracking some of these other jruby changes in his branch: 
experimental/petef-jruby

Original comment by jls.semi...@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2011 at 8:37

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

Original comment by jls.semi...@gmail.com on 14 Feb 2011 at 11:17

Added labels: Priority-High
Removed labels: Priority-Medium

GoogleCodeExporter commented 9 years ago

JRuby it is.

Original comment by jls.semi...@gmail.com on 19 Mar 2011 at 4:08

Changed state: Fixed