Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
Check. Actually I think the better name is to use throughout is
"magic_public_keys", as it's less ambiguous and less collision-prone. Are
there implementors who need to change though? Or should we just stick with
magic_keys?
Original comment by jpanzer@google.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 8:23
I don't have or know of any implementations of the json keys serialization.
"magic_public_keys" sounds good to me.
Original comment by charlie....@gmail.com
on 21 Jan 2011 at 10:07
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
charlie....@gmail.com
on 20 Jan 2011 at 10:03