github-actions[bot]
commented
8 months ago Thank you for your feature proposal.
We marked it as "waiting for user interest" for now to gather some feedback from our community:
- If you would like to see this feature be implemented, please react to the description with an up-vote (:+1:).
- If you have a suggestion or want to point out some special cases that need to be considered, please leave a comment, so we are aware about them.
We would also like to hear about other community members' use cases for the feature to give us a better understanding of their potential implicit or explicit requirements.
We will start the implementation based on:
- the number of votes (:+1:) and comments
- the relevance for the ecosystem
- availability of alternatives and workarounds
- and the complexity of the requested feature
We do this because:
- There are plenty of frameworks/tools out there and we would like to ensure that every method can cover all or almost all of them.
- Every feature we add to Visulima has "costs" associated to it:
- initial costs: design, implementation, reviews, documentation
- running costs: awareness of the feature itself, more complex module structure, increased bundle size, more work during refactors
---
[View more issues which are waiting for user interest](https://github.com/visulima/visulima/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+label%3A%22s%3A+waiting+for+user+interest%22+)
Clear and concise description of the problem
For some framework the html head overwrite is not possible, to fix this problem a virtual module implementation is needed.
Suggested solution
Alternative
No response
Additional context
The import should look like
images -> only the image meta data files -> only the files meta data metadata -> images + files meta data