Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
Do we really need to keep the old format as an option?
Original comment by rdama...@google.com
on 1 Nov 2010 at 6:04
It'd certainly be simpler to just switch. I asked on mytracks and
mytracks-dev, and received three requests to keep the 'track n' version as an
option: bartn@google.com, gill.smith@gmail.com, and dhudyma@gmail.com. Nobody
objected to having the timestamp be the default -- these three just asked that
they be able to fall back to 'track n'.
Original comment by simmonmt@google.com
on 1 Nov 2010 at 6:13
Ok then, reviewing.
Original comment by rdama...@google.com
on 1 Nov 2010 at 6:28
Original comment by simmonmt@google.com
on 12 Nov 2010 at 7:19
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
simmonmt@google.com
on 1 Nov 2010 at 6:02